We quite often get a flurry of reports around particular finds or topics. ....... Your post was no different to somebody squeeing to emphasise a particular photo in a new set and that's happened often enough.
Thanks for contributing your opinion here.
I may not have completely shared your enthusiasm on the same bits of the interview but ........ I'm glad I downloaded it.
Yes, of course there were other interesting points raised too, such as how Elijah is almost in awe of John Hurt (which some of us already thought anyway). It's good to have Elijah over here for a change so I'm sure other Brits will understand my squeeing about it!
it would be very boring if nothing was allowed but the absolute bare bones of the finds. It would be devoid of all personality.
I would tend to agree with you there. Maybe we should mark all posts so that it's clear whether they are "new news", "old news" (people do often re-post things from the past), or "squee" then readers can click or ignore as they please! ;-) Oh well, at least I (re-)posted the front cover from an old mag & a link to the article!
no subject
Thanks for contributing your opinion here.
I may not have completely shared your enthusiasm on the same bits of the interview but ........ I'm glad I downloaded it.
Yes, of course there were other interesting points raised too, such as how Elijah is almost in awe of John Hurt (which some of us already thought anyway). It's good to have Elijah over here for a change so I'm sure other Brits will understand my squeeing about it!
it would be very boring if nothing was allowed but the absolute bare bones of the finds. It would be devoid of all personality.
I would tend to agree with you there. Maybe we should mark all posts so that it's clear whether they are "new news", "old news" (people do often re-post things from the past), or "squee" then readers can click or ignore as they please! ;-) Oh well, at least I (re-)posted the front cover from an old mag & a link to the article!
~Lyra